GOVERNMENT

uestion 33 (Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)

(Policy and Elections 03.04 MC) <object:standard:ss.912.c.2.15>

Andres made an appointment to meet with a representative from his district. He wants to request funding on behalf of a local parents and students’ group to build a baseball field at the county park. Andres’ acted as a lobbyist for a

[removed] special interest group

[removed] labor union

[removed] political action committee

[removed] political party

 


 

Question 34 (Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)

(Citizenship 02.02 LC) <object:standard:ss.912.c.3.15>

Which of the following is a true statement about the Constitution?

[removed] It distributes power among three branches of government.

[removed] It has a president who heads three branches of government.

[removed] It imparts authority on tax policies to the state governments.

[removed] It gives supreme authority to the separate state governments.

 


 

Question 35 (Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)

(Citizenship 01.02 MC) <object:standard:ss.912.c.2.1>

Juan is not a legal U.S. citizen, but he has permission to live and work in the United States through

[removed] a driver’s license and may run for elected positions

[removed] his parents and may not run for elected positions

[removed] a visa and may not run for elected positions

[removed] birth and may run for elected positions

 


 

Question 36 (Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)

(Citizenship 02.03 MC) <object:standard:ss.912.c.3.1.4>

“Security and stability cannot be maintained through a confederation of individual, sovereign states.”

Which of the following best describes this quote?

[removed] It represents the perspective of a Federalist, arguing for a strong centralized government.

[removed] It represents the perspective of a Federalist, arguing for a weak centralized government.

[removed] It represents the perspective of an Anti-Federalist, arguing for a strong central government.

[removed] It represents the perspective of an Anti-Federalist, arguing for a weak central government.

 


 

Question 37 (Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)

(Courts and Civil Liberties 04.02 MC) <object:standard:ss.912.c.3.7>

The minority opinion of a decided case

[removed] is the official explanation for the final ruling that will apply to the case

[removed] is unnecessary unless the power of judicial review has been employed

[removed] expresses the justification for a dissenting opinion of one or more judges

[removed] supports the ruling of the majority but rationalizes it with different reasons

 


 

Question 38 (Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)

(Courts and Civil Liberties 04.02 MC) <object:standard:ss.912.c.3.7>

The decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on a constitutional issue is

[removed] considered null and void unless the state governments must amend their laws

[removed] unofficial until the legislative branch has an opportunity to edit the related law

[removed] final unless overturned by a constitutional amendment or new court decision

[removed] subject to a review by either the executive branch or the legislative branch

 


 

Question 39 (Multiple Choice Worth 4 points)

(Citizenship 02.05 HC) <object:standard:ss.912.c.2.6>

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Which of the following possible court cases could legitimately be argued under the terms of the quote above?

[removed] A person sues government officials for not making policies according to the person’s written letters.

[removed] A person uses and shares illegal substances with minors who all say the activity is for worship of faith.

[removed] A person refuses to leave a privately owned restaurant after being told the business was closed that day.

[removed] A person appeals a conviction for disturbing the peace by holding a protest sign each day outside city hall.

 


 

Question 40 (Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)

(Citizenship 02.05 MC) <object:standard:ss.912.c.2.7, ss.912.c.3.11=””>

Which of the following best explains why people do not have unlimited First Amendment rights?

[removed] It is inappropriate to criticize or condemn elected government officials.

[removed] Leaders worth following would be drowned out by meaningless speech.

[removed] Certain types of speech could infringe on others’ rights or public safety.

[removed] The government would be ineffective, weighed down by citizen requests.

 

Order now and get 10% discount on all orders above $50 now!!The professional are ready and willing handle your assignment.

ORDER NOW »»