3D bioprinting of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart A. Lee1*, A. R. Hudson1*, D. J. Shiwarski1, J. W. Tashman1, T. J. Hinton1, S. Yerneni1, J. M. Bliley1, P. G. Campbell1,2, A. W. Feinberg1,3†
Collagen is the primary component of the extracellularmatrix in the humanbody. It has proved challenging to fabricate collagen scaffolds capable of replicating the structure and function of tissues and organs.We present a method to 3D-bioprint collagen using freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels (FRESH) to engineer components of the human heart at various scales, from capillaries to the full organ. Control of pH-driven gelation provides 20-micrometer filament resolution, a porous microstructure that enables rapid cellular infiltration and microvascularization, and mechanical strength for fabrication and perfusion of multiscale vasculature and tri-leaflet valves.We found that FRESH 3D-bioprinted hearts accurately reproduce patient-specific anatomical structure as determined by micro–computed tomography.Cardiac ventricles printedwith human cardiomyocytes showed synchronized contractions, directional action potential propagation, and wall thickening up to 14% during peak systole.
F or biofabrication, the goal is to engineer tissue scaffolds to treat diseases for which there are limited options, such as end-stage organ failure. Three-dimensional (3D) bio- printing has achieved important milestones
including microphysiological devices (1), pat- terned tissues (2), perfusable vascular-like net-
works (3–5), and implantable scaffolds (6). However, direct printing of living cells and soft biomaterials such as extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins has proved difficult (7). A key obstacle is the problem of supporting these soft and dy- namic biological materials during the printing process to achieve the resolution and fidelity
required to recreate complex 3D structure and function. Recently, Dvir and colleagues 3D- printed a decellularized ECM hydrogel into a heart-like model and showed that human car- diomyocytes and endothelial cells could be in- tegrated into the print and were present as spherical nonaligned cells after 1 day in culture (8). However, no further structural or functional analysis was performed. We report the ability to directly 3D-bioprint
collagen with precise control of composition and microstructure to engineer tissue components of the human heart at multiple length scales. Collagen is an ideal material for biofabrication because of its critical role in the ECM, where it provides mechanical strength, enables struc- tural organization of cell and tissue compart- ments, and serves as a depot for cell adhesion and signaling molecules (9). However, it is dif- ficult to 3D-bioprint complex scaffolds using collagen in its native unmodified form because gelation is typically achieved using thermally driven self-assembly, which is difficult to control. Researchers have used approaches including
Lee et al., Science 365, 482–487 (2019) 2 August 2019 1 of 5
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. 2Engineering Research Accelerator, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. 3Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. *These authors contributed equally to this work. †Corresponding author. Email: email@example.com
Fig. 1. High-resolution 3D bioprinting of collagen using FRESH v2.0. (A) Time-lapse sequence of 3D bioprint- ing of the letters “CMU” using FRESH v2.0. (B) Schematic of acidified collagen solution extruded into the FRESH support bath buffered to pH 7.4, where rapid neutralization causes gelation and formation of a collagen filament. (C and D) Rep- resentative images of the gelatin microparticles in the support bath for (C) FRESH v1.0 and (D) v2.0, showing the decrease in size and polydispersity. (E) Histo- gram of Feret diameter distribution for gelatin microparticles in FRESH v1.0 (blue) and v2.0 (red). (F) Mean Feret diameter of gelatin micro- particles for FRESH v1.0 and v2.0 [N > 1200, data are means ± SD, ****P < 0.0001 (Student t test)]. (G) Storage (Gʹ) and loss (Gʺ) moduli for FRESH v1.0 and v2.0 support baths showing yield stress fluid behavior. (H) A “window-frame” print construct with single filaments across the middle, comparing G-code (left), FRESH v1.0 (center), and FRESH v2.0 (right). (I) Single filaments of collagen showing the variability of the smallest diameter (~250 mm) that can be printed using FRESH v1.0 (top) compared to relatively smooth filaments 20 to 200 mm in diameter using FRESH v2.0 (bottom). (J) Collagen filament Feret diameter as a function of extrusion needle internal diameter for FRESH v2.0, showing a linear relationship.
on A ugust 1, 2019
ow nloaded from
chemically modifying collagen into an ultraviolet (UV)–cross-linkable form (10), adjusting pH, temperature, and collagen concentration to con- trol gelation and print fidelity (11, 12), and/or denaturing it into gelatin (13) to make it ther- moreversible. However, these hydrogels are typ- ically soft and tend to sag, and they are difficult to print with high fidelity beyond a few layers in height. Instead, we developed an approach that uses rapid pH change to drive collagen self- assembly within a buffered support material, enabling us to (i) use chemically unmodified collagen as a bio-ink, (ii) enhance mechanical properties by using high collagen concentra- tions of 12 to 24 mg/ml, and (iii) create complex structural and functional tissue architectures. To accomplish this, we developed a substantially improved second generation of the freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels (FRESH v2.0) 3D-bioprinting technique used in combination with our custom-designed open- source hardware platforms (fig. S1) (14, 15). FRESH works by extruding bio-inks within a thermoreversible support bath composed of a gelatin microparticle slurry that provides support during printing and is subsequently
melted away at 37°C (Fig. 1, A and B, and movie S1) (16). The original version of the FRESH support
bath, termed FRESHv1.0, consisted of irregularly shaped microparticles with a mean diameter of ~65 mm created by mechanical blending of a large gelatin block (Fig. 1C) (16). In FRESH v2.0, we developed a coacervation approach to gen- erate gelatin microparticles with (i) uniform spherical morphology (Fig. 1D), (ii) reduced poly- dispersity (Fig. 1E), (iii) decreased particle diam- eter of ~25 mm (Fig. 1F), and (iv) tunable storage modulus and yield stress (Fig. 1G and fig. S2). FRESH v2.0 improves resolution with the ability to precisely generate collagen filaments and ac- curately reproduce complex G-code, as shown with a window-frame calibration print (Fig. 1H). Using FRESHv1.0, the smallest collagen filament reliably printed was ~250 mm in mean diameter, with highly variable morphology due to the rela- tively large and polydisperse gelatin micropar- ticles (Fig. 1I). In contrast, FRESH v2.0 improves the resolution by an order of magnitude, with collagen filaments reliably printed from 200 mm down to 20 mm in diameter (Fig. 1, I and J). Filament morphology from solid-like to highly
porous was controlled by tuning the collagen gelation rate using salt concentration and buffer- ing capacity of the gelatin support bath (fig. S3). A pH 7.4 support bath with 50 mM HEPES was the optimal balance between individual strand resolution and strand-to-strand adhesion and was versatile, enabling FRESH printing of mul- tiple bio-inks with orthogonal gelation mech- anisms including collagen-based inks, alginate, fibrinogen, andmethacrylated hyaluronic acid in the same print by adding CaCl2, thrombin, and UV light exposure (fig. S4) (15). We first focused on FRESH-printing a sim-
plified model of a small coronary artery–scale linear tube from collagen type I for perfusionwith a custom-designed pulsatile perfusion system (Fig. 2A and fig. S5). The linear tube had an inner diameter of 1.4 mm (fig. S6A) and a wall thick- ness of ~300 mm (fig. S6B), and was patent and manifold as determined by dextran perfusion (fig. S6, C to E, and movie S2) (15). C2C12 cells within a collagen gel were cast around the printed collagen tube to evaluate the ability to support a volumetric tissue. The static nonper- fused controls showedminimal compaction over 5 days (Fig. 2B), and a cross section revealeddead
Lee et al., Science 365, 482–487 (2019) 2 August 2019 2 of 5
Fig. 2. FRESH 3D bioprinting of perfusable collagen vessels and micro- porous collagen scaffolds that promote in vivo microvascularization. (A) FRESH-printed collagen tube construct. (B) C2C12 cell and collagen gel mixture cast around the collagen tube and static-cultured for 5 days. (C) Cross section of the tissue from (B) stained for live (green) and dead (red) cells. (D) C2C12 cell and collagen gel mixture cast around the collagen tube and perfused for 5 days. (E) Cross section of the tissue from (D) stained for live and dead cells. (F) Percent cell viability as a function of depth from the top surface of the tissues from the static and perfused collagen tube constructs [N = 3, data are means ± SD, *P < 0.05 (two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni multiple-comparisons posttest)]. (G) Multiphoton imaging showing microscale porosity in FRESH-printed collagen constructs after removal of the gelatin microparticle support bath. (H and I) Collagen
constructs cast (H) and FRESH-printed (I) without VEGF 7 days after subcutaneous implantation. (J and K) Masson’s trichrome staining to visualize cells (red) and collagen (blue) in cast (J) and FRESH-printed (K) collagen disks after 7 days of subcutaneous implantation. (L) Cell density after implantation as a function of depth for the cast and FRESH-printed collagen disks. (M and N) Collagen constructs cast (M) and FRESH-printed (N) with VEGF (100 ng/ml) 10 days after subcutaneous implantation. (O and P) CD31 staining (brown) and cells (blue) of cast (O) and FRESH- printed (P) collagen disks doped with VEGF (100 ng/ml) after 10 days of subcutaneous implantation. (Q) Host vascular infiltration of vessels (diameter 8 to 50 mm) in the FRESH-printed collagen disk labeled by lectin tail vein injection (red). (R) Multiphoton image 70 mm into the FRESH-printed construct, showing red blood cells within the lumen of the microvasculature.
RESEARCH | REPORT on A
ugust 1, 2019
cells throughout the interior volume with a layer of viable cells only at the surface (Fig. 2C). In contrast, after active perfusion for 5 days, C2C12 cells compacted the collagen gel around the col- lagen tube (Fig. 2D), demonstrating viability and active remodeling of the gel through cell-driven compaction. The cross section showed cells alive throughout the entire volume (Fig. 2E), and quan- titative analysis using LIVE/DEAD staining con- firmed high viability within the perfused vascular construct (Fig. 2F). Others have 3D-bioprinted vasculature by casting cell-laden hydrogels around fugitive filaments, which become the vessel lumens (4, 5). In comparison, we directly print collagen to form the walls of a functional vascular chan- nel, serving as the foundation for engineering more complex architectures. Engineering smaller-scale vasculature, espe-
cially on the order of capillaries (5 to 10 mm in diameter), has been a challenge for extrusion- based 3D bioprinting because this is far below common needle diameters. However, at this length scale, endothelial and perivascular cells can self-assemble vascular networks through angiogenesis (17). We reasoned that the gelatin microparticles in the FRESH v2.0 support bath could be incorporated into the 3D-bioprinted col- lagen to create a porous microstructure, specif- ically because pores on the order of 30 mm in
diameter have been shown to promote cell in- filtration and microvascularization (18). FRESH v2.0–printed constructs contained micropores ~25 mm in diameter resulting from the melting and removal of the gelatin microparticles pur- posely entrapped during the printing process (Fig. 2G andmovie S3). Collagen disks 5mm thick and 10 mm in diameter were cast in a mold or printed and implanted in an in vivo murine sub- cutaneous vascularizationmodel (Fig. 2, H and I, and fig. S7, A and B) to observe cellular infiltra- tion. After implantation for 3 and 7 days, collagen disks were extracted and assessed for gross mor- phology, cellularization, and collagen structure (fig. S7, C to E). The solid-cast collagen showed minimal cell infiltration (Fig. 2J), whereas the printed collagen had extensive cell infiltration and collagen remodeling (Fig. 2K). Quantitative analysis revealed that cells infiltrated throughout the printed collagen disk within 3 days (Fig. 2L and fig. S8) and that the number of cells in the constructs was significantly greater for the printed collagen at 3 and 7 days compared to cast control [N = 6, P < 0.0001, two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)] (15). To promote vascularization, we incorporated
fibronectin and the proangiogenic molecule re- combinant vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) into our collagen bio-ink (19). Collagen
disks that were FRESH-printed with VEGF and extracted after 10 days in vivo showed enhanced vascularization relative to cast controls (Fig. 2, M and N). By histology, the addition of VEGF to the cast collagen increased cell infiltration without promoting microvascularization (Fig. 2O and fig. S9). In contrast, the addition of VEGF to the printed collagen resulted in widespread vascu- larization, with CD31-positive vessels and red blood cells visible within the lumens (Fig. 2P). Tail vein injection of fluorescent lectin confirmed an extensive host-derived vascular network with vessels ranging from 8 to 50 mm in diameter throughout the printed collagen disk (Fig. 2Q, fig. S10, and movie S4). Multiphoton micros- copy enabled deeper imaging into the printed constructs and showed vessels containing red blood cells at depths of at least 200 mm (Fig. 2R and movie S5). We next FRESH-printed a model of the left
ventricle of the heart using human stem cell– derived cardiomyocytes.We used a dual-material printing strategy with collagen bio-ink as the structural component in combination with a high- density cell bio-ink (Fig. 3A) (15). A test print design (fig. S11A) verified that the collagen pH was neutralized quickly enough to maintain ~96% post-printing viability by LIVE/DEAD staining (fig. S11B). The ventricle was designed as
Lee et al., Science 365, 482–487 (2019) 2 August 2019 3 of 5
Fig. 3. Contractile FRESH 3D-bioprinted human cardiac ventricle model. (A) Schematic of dual-material FRESH printing using a collagen ink and a high-concentration cell ink. (B) Ventricle model with a central section of cardiac cells (pink), internal and external collagen shells (green), and a collagen-only section (yellow). (C) Micrograph of FRESH-printed ventricle. (D) Side view of FRESH- printed ventricle stained with calcium-sensitive dye showing uniform cell distribution. (E) Calcium mapping of the subregion [yellow box in (D)] showing spontaneous, directional calcium wave propagation with conduction velocity of 1.97 cm/s. (F) Top view of FRESH-printed ventricle stained with calcium-sensitive dye. (G) Calcium mapping showing spontaneous circular calcium wave propagation around the ventricle with conduction velocity of 1.31 cm/s. (H) Point stimulation of FRESH-printed ventricle stained with calcium- sensitive dye (red asterisk indicates electrode location). (I) Calcium mapping of the subregion [yellow box in (H)] showing anisotropic calcium wave propagation with longitudinal conduction velocity of 2.0 cm/s. (J) Calcium transient traces during spontaneous contractions (top), 1-Hz field stimulation (middle), and 2-Hz field stimulation (bottom). Calcium fluorescence intensity (F) is normalized by dividing by baseline fluorescence intensity (F0). (K) Top-down image of the FRESH- printed ventricle with inner (yellow) and outer (red) walls outlined. (L) A subregion of the ventricular wall analyzed for displacement during 1-Hz field stimulation, showing inner and outer wall motion; magnitude and direction are indicated by red arrows. (M) Cross-sectional area of the ventricle interior chamber at peak systole (N = 4, data are means ± SD).
RESEARCH | REPORT on A
ugust 1, 2019
Lee et al., Science 365, 482–487 (2019) 2 August 2019 4 of 5
Fig. 4. Organ-scale FRESH 3D bioprinting of tri-leaflet heart valve, multiscale vasculature, and neonatal-scale human heart. (A) Tri-leaflet heart valve 3D model at adult human scale. (B and C) Top and side views of FRESH-printed collagen heart valve with barium sulfate added for x-ray contrast. (D) mCT reconstruction showing the full printed valve. (E) Lateral cross section of the wall and leaflets. (F) Quantitative gauging of the mCT 3D surface compared to the 3D model, showing average overprinting of +0.55 mm and underprinting of –0.80 mm. (G) Sequence of valve opening under pulsatile flow over ~1 s. (H) Doppler flow velocimetry of a single cycle: (i) closed, (ii) half-open, and (iii) open. (I) Same as (H) over multiple cycles. (J) Maximum transvalvular pressure of printed alginate and collagen valves compared to operating pressure for native valves [N = 3, data are means ± SD, n.s. indicates P > 0.05 (Student t test)]. (K) MRI-derived 3D human heart model (gray) with computationally derived multiscale vascular network shown for the the left ventricle. The left anterior descending coronary artery (red) is the template to guide the formation of smaller-scale
vessels, which decrease in diameter according to distance from the coronary artery (red to blue). (L) Left ventricle with the left anterior descending artery (red), computationally generated vasculature (purple), and subregion of interest (pink). (M) Transparent subregion showing 3D structure of the vascular network. (N) The subregion FRESH-bioprinted with collagen, showing reproduction of the vascular network. (O) Perfusion of the vascular network with glycerol (red) through the coronary artery, showing interconnectivity. (P) Collagen was optically cleared and perfused with glycerol (red), showing perfusion down to vessels ~100 mm in diameter. (Q) MRI-derived 3D human heart scaled to neonatal size. (R) FRESH-printed collagen heart. (S) Cross-sectional view of the collagen heart, showing left and right ventricles and interior structures. (T and U) High-fidelity image of the trabeculae in the left ventricle (T) showing reproduction of the complex anatomical structure from the G-code (U). (V and W) High-fidelity image of the septal wall between ventricles (V) showing reproduction of the square-lattice infill from the G-code (W).
RESEARCH | REPORT on A
ugust 1, 2019
an ellipsoidal shell (Fig. 3B) with inner and outer walls of collagen and a central core region con- taining human embryonic stem cell–derived cardiomyocytes (hESC-CMs) and 2% cardiac fibroblasts (fig. S11, C to H). Ventricles were printed and cultured for up to 28 days, during which the collagen inner and outer walls pro- vided sufficient structural integrity to maintain their intended geometry (Fig. 3C). After 4 days, the ventricles visibly contracted, and after 7 days they became synchronous with a dense layer of interconnected and striated hESC-CMs, as con- firmed by immunofluorescent staining of sarco- meric a-actinin–positive myofibrils (fig. S11, I to K). Calcium imaging revealed contracting hESC-CMs throughout the entire printed ven- tricles, with directional wave propagation in the direction of the printed hESC-CMs observed from the side (Fig. 3, D and E) and top (Fig. 3, F and G) during spontaneous contractions in multiple ven- tricles (N = 3) (movie S6). Point stimulation enabled visualization of anisotropic calciumwave propagation with longitudinal conduction veloc- ity of ~2 cm/s and a longitudinal-to-transverse anisotropy ratio of ~1.5 (Fig. 3, H and I). The ventricles had a baseline spontaneous beat rate of ~0.5 Hz and could be captured and paced at 1 and 2Hz bymeans of field stimulation (Fig. 3J). We imaged the ventricles top-down to quantify motion of the inner and outer walls (Fig. 3K). Wall thickening is a hallmark of normal ventric- ular contraction. The printed ventricle expanded both inward and outward during a contraction, as determined by particle tracking to map the deformation field (Fig. 3L). The decrease in cross- sectional area of the interior chamber during peak systole showed a maximum of ~5% at 1-Hz pacing (N = 4) (Fig. 3M and movie S6). We also observed electrophysiologic behavior associated with arrhythmogenic disease states, including multiple propagating waves (fig. S12, A and B) and pinned rotors (fig. S12, C and D). To demonstrate the mechanical integrity and
function of collagen constructs at adult human scale, we printed a tri-leaflet heart valve 28 mm in diameter (Fig. 4A). We first prototyped the valve using alginate, a material previously used to build valve models (20), and then printed a collagen valve and improved the mechanical properties by adapting published fixation pro- tocols for decellularized porcine heart valves (fig. S13A) (15, 21). The collagen valve had well- separated leaflets, was robust enough to be handled in air (Fig. 4, B and C, and movie S7), and was imaged by micro–computed tomogra- phy (mCT) (Fig. 4, D and E, and movie S8). Print fidelity was quantified using gauging to overlay the mCT data on the 3D model (fig. S13B), show- ing average overprinting of +0.55 mm and un- derprinting of –0.80 mm (Fig. 4F and fig. S13, C and D). Mechanical function was demonstrated by mounting the valve in a flow system with a pulsatile pump to simulate physiologic pressures, and we observed cyclical opening and closing of the valve leaflets (Fig. 4G and movie S7). We quantified flow through the valves (Fig. 4H) and demonstrated <15% regurgitation (Fig. 4I) with a
maximum area opening of 19.5% (Fig. 4G). Ad- ditionally, the maximum transvalvular pressure was greater than 40 mmHg for the collagen and alginate valves (Fig. 4J), exceeding standard phys- iologic pressures for the tricuspid and pulmonary valves but less than the aortic andmitral valves (22). Further, human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) cultured on unfixed collagen leaf- lets formed a confluent monolayer (fig. S13E). A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–derived
computer-aided design (CAD) model of an adult human heart was created, complete with inter- nal structures such as valves, trabeculae, large veins, and arteries, but lacking smaller-scale ves- sels. To address this, we developed a computa- tional method that uses the coronary arteries as the template to generate multiscale vasculature (fig. S14 andmovie S9).We created a space-filling branching network based on a 3D Voronoi lat- tice, where vessels further from the left coronary arteries (red to blue) have a denser network and smaller diameters, down to ~100 mm (Fig. 4K). A subregion of the generated vasculature contain- ing the left anterior descending artery (LAD) was selected, rendered, and printed from collagen at adult human scale (Fig. 4, L to N). Patency of large vessels was demonstrated by perfusing the multiscale vasculature through the root of the LAD (Fig. 4O). We confirmed the patency of ves- sels ~100 mm in diameter by optically clearing and reperfusing the multiscale vasculature (Fig. 4P, fig. S14, N to P, and movie S9). Finally, to demonstrate organ-scale FRESH
v2.0 printing capabilities and the potential to engineer larger scaffolds, we printed a neonatal- scale human heart from collagen (Fig. 4, Q and R, and fig. S15, A to C). To highlight the micro- scale internal structure, we printed half the heart (Fig. 4S). Structures such as trabeculae were printed from collagen with the same architec- ture as defined in the G-code file (Fig. 4, T and U). The square-lattice infill pattern within the ventricular walls was similarly well defined (Fig. 4, V and W). We used mCT imaging to confirm reproduction of all the anatomical structures contained within the 3D model of the heart, in- cluding the atrial and ventricular chambers, trabeculae, and pulmonary and aortic valves (fig. S15, D to I, and movie S10). We have used the human heart for proof of
concept; however, FRESH v2.0 printing of col- lagen is a platform that can build advanced tis- sue scaffolds for a wide range of organ systems. There are still many challenges to overcome, such as generating the billions of cells required to 3D-bioprint large tissues, achievingmanufac- turing scale, and creating a regulatory process for clinical translation (23). Although the 3D bioprinting of a fully functional organ is yet to be achieved, we now have the ability to build constructs that start to recapitulate the struc- tural, mechanical, and biological properties of native tissues.
REFERENCES AND NOTES
1. J. U. Lind et al., Nat. Mater. 16, 303–308 (2017). 2. X. Ma et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 2206–2211 (2016).
3. B. Grigoryan et al., Science 364, 458–464 (2019). 4. J. S. Miller et al., Nat. Mater. 11, 768–774 (2012). 5. D. B. Kolesky, K. A. Homan, M. A. Skylar-Scott, J. A. Lewis,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 3179–3184 (2016). 6. H.-W. Kang et al., Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 312–319 (2016). 7. T. J. Hinton, A. Lee, A. W. Feinberg, Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. 1,
31–37 (2017). 8. N. Noor et al., Adv. Sci. 6, 1900344 (2019). 9. C. Frantz, K. M. Stewart, V. M. Weaver, J. Cell Sci. 123,
4195–4200 (2010). 10. K. E. Drzewiecki et al., Langmuir 30, 11204–11211 (2014). 11. N. Diamantides et al., Biofabrication 9, 034102 (2017). 12. S. Rhee, J. L. Puetzer, B. N. Mason, C. A. Reinhart-King,
L. J. Bonassar, ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2, 1800–1805 (2016).
13. B. Duan, E. Kapetanovic, L. A. Hockaday, J. T. Butcher, Acta Biomater. 10, 1836–1846 (2014).
14. K. Pusch, T. J. Hinton, A. W. Feinberg, HardwareX 3, 49–61 (2018).
15. See supplementary materials. 16. T. J. Hinton et al., Sci. Adv. 1, e1500758 (2015). 17. M. Potente, H. Gerhardt, P. Carmeliet, Cell 146, 873–887
(2011). 18. L. R. Madden et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107,
15211–15216 (2010). 19. A.-K. Olsson, A. Dimberg, J. Kreuger, L. Claesson-Welsh,
Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 359–371 (2006). 20. B. Duan, L. A. Hockaday, K. H. Kang, J. T. Butcher 3rd,
J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 101, 1255–1264 (2013). 21. H.-G. Lim, G. B. Kim, S. Jeong, Y. J. Kim,
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 48, 104–113 (2015). 22. A. Hasan et al., J. Biomech. 47, 1949–1963 (2014). 23. J. S. Miller, PLOS Biol. 12, e1001882 (2014).
We thank D. Trumble and K. Cook for access to and assistance with pulsatile flow setup, Doppler flow velocimetry, and pressure transducer measurements; Y. L. Wang for use of the Form 2 3D printer; S. Sohn for time-lapse imaging of the “CMU” print; and K. Verdelis for assistance with mCT analysis. Funding: Supported by NIH grants DP2HL117750, F32HL142229, and R21HD090679, FDA grant R01FD006582, NSF grant CMMI 1454248, Office of Naval Research grant N00014-17-1-2566, Congressional Directed Medical Research Program grant W81XWH1610018, and the College of Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University under the Bioengineered Organs Initiative and the Manufacturing Futures Initiative. Author contributions: A.L., A.R.H., T.J.H., D.J.S., J.W.T., S.Y., J.M.B., and A.W.F. designed the overall experimental plan; A.L., A.R.H., and T.J.H. developed FRESH v2.0 support material and performed validation experiments; S.Y., J.W.T., and D.J.S. designed experiments and performed FRESH printing and in vivo testing of collagen constructs; A.L., J.M.B., D.J.S., and J.W.T. designed experiments, developed hardware and software, and performed FRESH printing and culture of vascular constructs and ventricles; A.R.H. and T.J.H. designed experiments, developed hardware and software, and performed organ-scale FRESH printing of whole heart, multiscale perfusable vasculature, and tri-leaflet heart valve; and A.L., A.R.H., T.J.H., D.J.S., J.W.T., S.Y., J.M.B., P.G.C., and A.W.F. interpreted data and wrote the manuscript. Competing interests: A.L., A.R.H., T.J.H., and A.W.F. all have an equity stake in FluidForm Inc., which is a startup company commercializing FRESH 3D printing. FRESH 3D printing is the subject of patent protection including U.S. Patent 10,150,258 and others. A.W.F. has an equity stake in Biolife4D Inc. and is a member of its scientific advisory board. Data and materials availability: All data are available in the main text and the supplementary materials. FRESH v2.0 support material is available from A.W.F. under a material agreement with Carnegie Mellon University. The STL files for 3D bioprinter hardware modifications, collagen constructs, and perfusion systems are available under an open-source CC-BY-SA license at https://3dprint.nih.gov/users/awfeinberg.
science.sciencemag.org/content/365/6452/482/suppl/DC1 Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S15 Table S1 Movies S1 to S10 References (24–27)
3 November 2018; accepted 5 June 2019 10.1126/science.aav9051
Lee et al., Science 365, 482–487 (2019) 2 August 2019 5 of 5
RESEARCH | REPORT on A
ugust 1, 2019
3D bioprinting of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart
Feinberg A. Lee, A. R. Hudson, D. J. Shiwarski, J. W. Tashman, T. J. Hinton, S. Yerneni, J. M. Bliley, P. G. Campbell and A. W.
DOI: 10.1126/science.aav9051 (6452), 482-487.365Science
, this issue p. 482; see also p. 446Science of the human heart spanning capillary to full-organ scale, which they validated for tissue and organ function. into the scaffold via embedding of gelatin spheres. The authors demonstrated successful 3D printing of five components provide up to 10-micrometer resolution on printing. Cells could be embedded in the collagen or pores could be introduced tissues (see the Perspective by Dasgupta and Black). Collagen gelation was controlled by modulation of pH and could
describe a 3D printing technique to build complex collagen scaffolds for engineering biologicalet al.can be printed. Lee 3D bioprinting is still a fairly new technique that has been limited in terms of resolution and by the materials that
If I only had a heart
ARTICLE TOOLS http://science.sciencemag.org/content/365/6452/482
MATERIALS SUPPLEMENTARY http://science.sciencemag.org/content/suppl/2019/07/31/365.6452.482.DC1
CONTENT RELATED http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/365/6452/446.full
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/365/6452/482#BIBL This article cites 27 articles, 8 of which you can access for free
Terms of ServiceUse of this article is subject to the
is a registered trademark of AAAS.Science licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. The title Science, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. 2017 © The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive
(print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published by the American Association for the Advancement ofScience
on A ugust 1, 2019
ow nloaded from