Applied Sciences

Your Theory of Cheating Behavior – Is it just personal or scientific?

Post your detailed theory of cheating behaviors in monogamous, close romantic relationships (or infidelity within marriage).

Stay objective as you would in a Scientific Study.  Do not include your or another individual’s personal experiences.

Utilize the Scientific Process of Observation, Theory Development, Specific Hypotheses, and Hypothesis Testing.

  • In other words,
    • Describe what is cheating.
    • What predicts cheating?
    • What are the underlying theoretical causes or conditions that promote cheating?
    • How cheating behaviors can be changed or controlled?

Include in your post

  • Is your theory is scientific?
    • If so, specifically how can you test and confirm your theory?
      • If not, explain why and be specific.Unit 3: RUA: We Can, but Dare We?
        Submit Assignment

        Due Mar 22 by 11:59pm
        Points 240
        Submitting a file upload
        As healthcare providers, we look more and more to technology to improve patient outcomes, streamline operations, and lower costs. Sometimes, technology can be used in ways that have ethical, moral, and legal considerations too. You will be writing about the use of personal devices and social media and its use in healthcare. We can do it, but dare we?

        This is a “think outside the box” assignment in which there is not necessarily only one right answer. Still, you are required to find sources that support your opinions. Be sure to cite and reference them in your paper. Download the We Can, but Dare We guidelines (Links to an external site.).

        Submit the assignment by the due date, as instructed by your faculty member.

        Rubric
        We Can, But Dare We?We Can, But Dare We?CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction40.0 to >34.0 ptsHighest PeformanceThe student catches the reader’s attention, states the paper’s purpose, and provides a narrative outline of the paper’s body.34.0 to >29.0 ptsHigh PerformanceOne of the following is missing or inadequate: attention‐catching statement(s), paper’s purpose, or a narrative outline of the paper’s body.29.0 to >25.0 ptsAcceptable PerformanceTwo of the following are missing or inadequate: attention‐catching statement(s), paper’s purpose, or a narrative outline of the paper’s body.25.0 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementThree of the following are missing or inadequate: attention‐catching statement(s), paper’s purpose, or a narrative outline of the paper’s body.40.0 pts
        This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHIPAA, Legal, & Regulatory Discussion40.0 to >34.0 ptsHighest PerformanceThe discussion of the following as they apply to the use of cellphones and social media in healthcare, is thoroughly addressed:  HIPAA/regulatory requirements  Other legal requirements appropriate to the use of this technology Demonstrated support from sources of evidence included as intext citations.34.0 to >29.0 ptsHigh PerformanceThe discussion of the following as they apply to the use of cellphones and social media in healthcare, is lacking in one or more component: • HIPAA/regulatory requirements • Other legal requirements appropriate to the use of this technology or Support is not demonstrated adequately from sources of evidence included as in‐text citations.29.0 to >25.0 ptsAcceptable PerformanceThe discussion of the following as they apply to the use of cellphones and social media in healthcare, is lacking in one or more component: • HIPAA/regulatory requirements • Other legal requirements appropriate to the use of this technology and Support is not demonstrated adequately from sources of evidence included as in‐text citations.25.0 to >0 ptsNo DescriptionThe discussion of the following as they apply to the use of cellphones and social media in healthcare, is lacking both components: • HIPAA/regulatory requirements • Other legal requirements appropriate to the use of this technology and Support is not demonstrated adequately from sources of evidence included as in‐text citations.40.0 pts
        This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario Ending & Recommendations50.0 to >42.0 ptsNo DescriptionIncluded all of the following elements sufficiently: • Identify one of the four possible endings provided for the scenario. • Made recommendations about what should have been done. • Made recommendations about what could be done to correct or mitigate the problems caused by the scenario and the ending chosen. • Demonstrated support from sources of evidence included as intext citations.42.0 to >39.0 ptsNo DescriptionIncluded all of the following elements but did not develop at least one area substantively : • Identify one of the four possible endings provided for the scenario. • Made recommendations about what should have been done. • Made recommendations about what could be done to correct or mitigate the problems caused by the scenario and the ending chosen. Or • Did not demonstrated support from sources of evidence included as in‐text citations.39.0 to >35.0 ptsNo DescriptionIncluded all of the following elements but did not develop at two or more area substantively : • Identify one of the four possible endings provided for the scenario. • Made recommendations about what should have been done. • Made recommendations about what could be done to correct or mitigate the problems caused by the scenario and the ending chosen. Or • Did not demonstrated support from sources of evidence included as in‐text citations.35.0 to >0 ptsNo DescriptionDid not included the following elements substantively : • Identify one of the four possible endings provided for the scenario. • Made recommendations about what should have been done. • Made recommendations about what could be done to correct or mitigate the problems caused by the scenario and the ending chosen. Or • Did not demonstrated support from sources of evidence included as in‐text citations.50.0 pts
        This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion50.0 to >44.0 ptsNo DescriptionMet all of the following criteria: • Discussed at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of using smartphones and social media in healthcare • Described professional and ethical principles to the appropriate use of this technology • Demonstrated support from sources of evidence included as intext citations.44.0 to >41.0 ptsNo DescriptionDid not meet one of the following criteria: • Discussed at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of using smartphones and social media in healthcare • Described professional and ethical principles to the appropriate use of this technology • Demonstrated support from sources of evidence included as intext citations.41.0 to >37.0 ptsNo DescriptionDid not meet two or more of the following criteria: • Discussed at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of using smartphones and social media in healthcare • Described professional and ethical principles to the appropriate use of this technology • Demonstrated support from sources of evidence included as intext citations.37.0 to >0 ptsNo DescriptionDid not meet Three or more of the following criteria: • Discussed at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of using smartphones and social media in healthcare • Described professional and ethical principles to the appropriate use of this technology • Demonstrated support from sources of evidence included as intext citations. 0‐3550.0 pts
        This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion and Reflections30.0 to >28.0 ptsNo DescriptionMet the following criteria substantively: • Summarized what you learned • Made reflections about lessons learned to your practice.28.0 to >25.0 ptsNo DescriptionDid not meet at least one of the following criteria substantively: • Summarize what you learned • Make reflections about lessons learned to your practice.25.0 to >22.0 ptsNo DescriptionDid not meet either of the following criteria substantively: • Summarize what you learned • Make reflections about lessons learned to your practice.22.0 to >0 ptsNo DescriptionDid not include a formal conclusion paragraph30.0 pts
        This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing and APA Format30.0 to >0.0 ptsPoints Earned if PresentThe following points are achieved by successful implementation of each scholarly writing/APA element: • 6 points Title page, running head, & page numbers are correct. • 4 points Use Microsoft Word and APA (6th ed.) formatting • 2 point Length is 4‐5 pages (excludes title & reference pages). • 6 points At least 3 references are used, listed in APA format • 6 points References match in text citations in APA format • 4 points Spelling/mechanics & grammar are correct. • 2 point Scholarly writing style is used0.0 ptsPoints Lost if Not Present (deduct all points for each criterion not met)The following points are achieved by successful implementation of each scholarly writing/APA element: • 6 points Title page, running head, & page numbers are correct. • 4 points Use Microsoft Word and APA (6th ed.) formatting • 2 point Length is 4‐5 pages (excludes title & reference pages). • 6 points At least 3 references are used, listed in APA format • 6 points References match in text citations in APA format • 4 points Spelling/mechanics & grammar are correct. • 2 point Scholarly writing style is used30.0 pts
        Total Points: 240.0PreviousNextTop

Order now and get 10% discount on all orders above $50 now!!The professional are ready and willing handle your assignment.

ORDER NOW »»